YspeopleExplore tab

I'm with Germaine, the ‘me too’ movement's crap


Thumb angry biker showing middle finger with both hands 000078716059 small

About Subversive

Do you have your own gripe with your local or state government? And what are the streets like in your part of town, in your home state?

If you'd like me to fire a rocket up them, or a shoddy business, I'm listening! You can email me here.


Germaine Greer’s response to the ''me too'' movement was swift, precise, and spot on. Here's why.

In the interests of full disclosure, let me be clear, I am a man!

Feminist Germane Greer is on the money.

Feminist Germane Greer is on the money.

Those readers familiar with my posts will understand it when I say I have no time for the ''me too'' movement. 

I will also be up front and put it on the record that I have little time for many advocates of this same movement. This includes the all too self-righteous Oprah Winfrey in the United States,  and the all too ''hell hath no fury'' Tracey Spicer in Australia.

Oprah seems to think she is an expert on every subject, rather than a TV talkshow host who struck it big. Meanwhile, Tracey seems to have been retrenched once too often for her ego.

Read more from Subversive Sam: How big business is giving you the shaft

This said, I have no quibble with the objectives of the ''me too'' movement and find the alleged behaviour of Harvey Weinstein and Don Burke, among others, distressing in the extreme.

If these men and others like them are guilty of what they are accused, they need to be charged, prosecuted and jailed. If their offences were as they are said to have been, but no laws have been broken, they deserve to be shunned and the laws may need to be changed.

But none of this provides a rationale for the ''me too'' movement, a bunch of women trying to develop and flex political muscle the way that men have over their treatment in the Family Court.

In both cases, there are issues that need to be addressed. But there are also far too many generalisations, people convicted without ever having their day in court, meaningless platitudes and far too much pack behaviour.

For most of my adult life, I've been a big fan of Germaine Greer. She is very smart and well educated, unlike Tracey Spicer (as far as I can see); and very considered and academically rigorous, unlike Oprah Winfrey (as far as I can tell). Unlike Tracey, Germaine is a thinker; and unlike Oprah, Germaine is not a populist, or pack animal.

Germaine’s response to the ''me too'' movement was swift and precise. She said: ''Women facing sexual harassment should take direct and immediate action against the men preying on them.''

That's spot on, in my view.

Why didn't the actresses and models take ''direct and immediate action'' against Harvey Weinstein and Don Burke? Was it because the money and the fame associated with what they were doing with Harvey and Don were more important to them than doing the right thing?  

Rather than complaining at the time, leading to immediate action being taken by the authorities (and thus potentially protecting many women since), these women took the money and fame, and only acted when they were no longer dependent on Harvey or Don.

Instead of having the courage to take a stand when it happened, these women did so when a pack was formed. A bunch of women bitter about how the media and entertainment worlds had treated them saw an opportunity to be in the limelight again.

It reminds me of the famous words of Martin Niemoller after World War II.

First they came for the Communists

And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist

Then they came for the Socialists

And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist

Then they came for the trade unionists

And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist

Then they came for the Jews

And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew

Then they came for me

And there was no one left
To speak out for me

It is much easier to speak up years later.

My other concern about the ''me too'' movement is their passion for trial by media. I have never liked Don Burke or anything he stands for, but he has also never been convicted of a crime.

From what I've seen, Harvey Weinstein personifies all that I dislike about the American nation, but he is yet to be convicted of a crime. I have little interest in actors such as Dustin Hoffman and Kevin Spacey, but I know that they've never been convicted of a crime.

This all smacks of the Salem witch hunts. Let’s point the finger at a bunch of people, convict them in the court of public opinion and then destroy them, because we can.

I will close with a quote from Germaine Greer:

"What makes it different is when the man has economic power, as Harvey Weinstein has. But if you spread your legs because he said 'be nice to me and I'll give you a job in a movie', then I'm afraid that's tantamount to consent and it's too late now to start whingeing about that.

"I want women to react here and now. I want the woman on a train who feels a man's hand where it shouldn't be … to be able to say quite clearly, 'stop!'“.

Banner 1
Wljqtpatlxigmfeexanj
Trending stories
Emu and Saltbush.

Meat pies, prawns .. what is true Australian food?

Foraging chef Paul Iskov...

(Epicure) 16 days ago
Top Indonesian chef Chandra Yudasswara will be cooking up a secret storm for Taste Great Southern.

Celebrity chef set for a Secret Affair in Great Southern

Take one of Indonesia's top...

(Epicure) About 1 month ago
A class divided passport of the 80s.

My passport is a snapshot of an uglier time

You only have to look at my...

(Love & Relationships) 4 days ago
You better Belieber it! Justin Bieber is every where.

Calling all pranksters, I need your help

I love a good prank or...

(Entertainment & Culture) 3 days ago
Weekly Poll
Haiku of the week
Qostn7rscbnwxvfayn0x
Photographic memories
A2ap0bnod9tar2b2omis
Share with us!